On Thursday, the final day of operations for 2016 week 2, participants operated primarily in the Raleigh and Blacksburg CWA's.
GOES-R LAP
- GFS underdid CAPE values all week.
- These fields are useful for situational awareness, especially for getting a quick look at the environment when you are just sitting down.
- Would it be possible to use RAP for these retrievals over CONUS?
- I liked being able to see what moisture was doing at the different atmospheric layers. It worked well to overlay the satellite-derived winds on the layer PW.
- The other day, it was really helpful to see the drier air moving in at the upper levels, with increasing moisture at the lower levels. It is nice to have this in a 4-panel display.
GOES-R CI
- In most cases this week, I could diagnose from the cloud evolution where CI was imminent. But severe CI, when it works, is very useful
- Severe CI would be more useful in warning operations than regular CI, but it was pretty bad in most situations.
- Both CI's did really well in Lubbock this week. CI picked up on a broad area where convection developed, and severe CI focused in on where the best storms ended up developing.
- CI was good when we were in Missouri. It didn't always target the exact cells, but it usually did give us the general area where CI was imminant.
- If it highlights the general area of future CI, that is good enough for me. I don't need to know exact cloud.
- As a broadcaster, I would love to have this in my office. Often I don't have as much time to analyze the weather before my broadcast. This is something I could have up when I begin my day. I see it being very beneficial to the broadcast community.
- This would be more useful for the shift coordinator, and for DSS, over the warning forecaster.
- I liked setting all values below 30% to be transparent. It decluttered the image a lot. I like being able to see the satellite imagery.
- The product display did not bother me.
- I'd like to see products like this be based off of the 1-min data. Something that could alert us to imminent development, since there is so much data.
ProbSevere
- In general, I really liked it. It sometimes gave me a false sense of security. When it trended down, this gave me confidence to focus my attention on other storms
- It is a limitation that it struggles with linear modes.
- Every office has the capability to change the color table. Various offices might want a different break point. it is a preference.
- I like the outline, I think that is the way to display these things.
- For contours, when using with radar, the contour is displaced. I recommend having it loaded on a seperate display with MRMS
- I would have wargen display with radar and a seperate display with MRMS and ProbSevere.
- I think it covers wind threats very well, but wind was difficult.
- We would definitely like to have probs by threat, in addition to total severe
- If this helped us with wind, it would be even more valuable than it is now
- It provides a nice comprehensive overview
- I foresee having a 4-panel with probsevere, probwind, probhail, and probtor
- For the hail threat, maybe look at including -20C reflectivity - this could help with area of storm and magnitude
- For tor, somehow including information about the presence of an RFD could help. Also, LL SRH, 0-1 km shear, storm motion, streamwise vorticity
SRSOR
- This week sold me on the value of 1-min imagery. At first I was like, it's really pretty. The storm over Kirksville was in a data sparse region and had explosive growth evident in the 1-min data. This visualization pushed me over the edge to warn. There was a similar case yesterday where convection developed rapidly so I warned early. This is something I will use in my warning decisions in addition to looking at radar.
- Broadcaster: I would definitely show this on TV, either by itself or under radar. Viewers like to see interesting stuff. I would also use this for diagnosis behind the scenes.
- The lack of data along the Mexico border hurts, but the 1-min data will help to fill this gap.
- I see utility for the parallax-corrected imagery. It appears to properly make the correction.
10-min Satellite-derived winds
- I see utility for marine areas, special marine warnings, seeing flow at low levels, warning decisions in marine areas.
- I would like to have seen more upper-level winds
- I used the LL winds to verify the low shear environment and to project the movement of storms. They were helpful in showing which direction the storms would move.
Lightning Jump
- I tried playing with the transparency, but it didn't really work out for me.
- I would have benefited from a cheat sheet to know what exactly to look for.
- It was nice seeing the jumps yesterday, and that the storm strength did fluctuate with jumps. I wouldn't use it alone, but would use it in tandem with other tools.
- Training with this product will be important
- I imagine people will want a threshold to go off of
- An issue is when multiple storms merge and cause a false trigger.
- With ProbSevere and LJ, I liked having them in a SA display, with MRMS composite or -20C reflectivity underlay. I found this helpful to get a big picture view, highlighting areas of interest. Certainly something I would use in operations.
- I think warning coordinator would be best to monitor these products, distributing the workload.
PGLM
- I think having lightning contoured as opposed to the image would be less obtrusive.
NUCAPS
- For the Plan view: theta-e, CAPE, LRs, dew points, DCAPE.
- I will compare NUCAPS with RAOBs when available to help improve my understanding of NUCAPS.
- I would like to analyze this in the evening, for diagnosing transition of events from severe to heavy rain/MCS.
- Although I would like the surface modifications to be modified, if this does occur, I still want to be able to view the original profile.
Other:
- I would look at an improved OT (and enhanced-V) detection product from
GOES-R. Summary products are good. There is so much data coming in,
this would help.
- I liked having the product sheet there in front of me so I remembered what to look at and how to view it.
- We did not feel like there were too many products to evaluate.
- Broadcaster: The training beforehand was extremely helpful. Not ever having AWIPS experience, it did help a lot to get exposure beforehand. This was an eye-opening experience to what folks at the NWS do every day, I am blown away. I think every broadcaster should get to do something like this. I can't wait until these products become available. I am going to sit down with Baron and ask how they are going to do this.
- It was nice to have experience forecasting in different regions of the country.
- For the most busy days, it was hard to focus on evaluating the products. On these days, should have all forecasters in the same CWA.
- Having more developers here would be helpful.
- All forecasters indicated they enjoyed their experience.