Below are comments from yesterday's activity:
GLM
Came in pretty open minded and didn’t know what to expect
Found it useful overlayed with the ENI data
Helped provide more details than what was there before
Liked having the aerial extent of lightning for lightning safety
Found it useful to incorporate within a TV broadcast, especially in showing the coverage of the lightning
within a storm
Still useful to compare with current lightning network to get the CG strokes in conjunction with the GLM
data
Not sure what to make of the event density and group density with it being the first time seeing it
With the 5 minute running sum, a lot of the cores would run off the top of the color scale
ProbSevere
Seemed to work pretty well with the convective line in Virginia
ProbTor had a bit of a ramp up as the storms approached D.C. as some rotation developed around D.C.
on the north end of the line
The color scale seems not intuitive where the low end and high end fit both in the cool color range
Provides good triage in busy situations and works very well
Tried overlaying it on MRMS products instead of having it on base data and liked having it that way
pretty well
Having more discrete colors instead of a gradient or have increasing line thickness with higher
probabilities
ProbTor should probably have a different color scale loaded more to the lower end instead of the
same as wind and hail.
Think it’s better to have all of the individual hazards contours and readouts than the whole big long
readout
It would be useful to have a time series tool for ProbSevere
NUCAPS
Modified didn’t come in yesterday would have been a useful product yesterday.
Surface temperatures and dew points were quite a bit too cold in the regular NUCAPS
The spatial availability is a great aspect of the soundings especially in areas of sparse coverage
Thought the data looked pretty good particularly in the mid and upper levels
Training needs to be hit harder to know that these soundings exist now
Gridded products need to be simplified to have options of surface data instead of just pressure levels
Having the more passes the better
Useful for these purposes of having greater observational coverage
For boundary layer identification having the more timely data is very important, when looking at lapse
rates or something having the less timely data can still be useful
Bad soundings were advertised as bad
CI and All-Sky LAP
The All-Sky LAP was found useful but could definitely see where the model is seen
Might be better to use the RAP or to have a little better blending to make it less blocky
The CI didn’t seem to handle the towering Cu in NW Oklahoma very well where convection ended up
firing later in the day
There were quite a few false alarm areas in the field as well
Would be able to filter out some of the noise by raising the lower end threshold to eliminate some of
the very low probabilities
Didn’t look at the severe since regular CI values were all pretty low