- Bucky
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
1-min VIS/IR During Warning Ops
During convective warning operations, I prefer to have a 2-panel VIS and IR display for monitoring storm top convective trends. Persistent features such as overshooting tops and above anvil cirrus plumes indicate particularly strong updrafts and long-lived storms. This was the case with many of our storms today, including that shown below.
another bad ProbSVR DDC
Another ProbSVR contour appeared where no echoes existed in the base reflectivity for KDDC. MRMS Composite reflectivity showed an apparent old volume scan still being used.
GLM Trends
Here is a 4-Panel lightning loop near the Nebraska/Kansas border. The loop is 30 minutes long.
Upper Left: 1-minute GLM Flash Extend Density
Upper Right: 1-minute GLM Average Flash Area
Lower Right: 1-minute GLM Total Energy
Lower Left: 0.5 Reflectivity with 1-minute Cloud to Ground ENTLN lightning Plot overlayed.
Upper Left: Notice the one area with a higher Flash Extend Density. It's indicative of a stronger, consistent updraft. There is more mixing of the charges going on, which is helping to generate more lightning activity.
Upper Right: Notice the area where the higher updraft should be. It has a general lower flash area. This is because there there are more flashes happening at a lower threshold due to the mixing of the charges. However, there is the occasional jump in area (a brighter color). This is because charge increases over time in the anvil. Then, when lightning happens in the anvil, it has more charge.
Lower Right: Notice the energy is higher where there is more lightning activity, generally near the updraft. It's like viewing the overall wattage of the storm using a high-speed camera.
Lower Left: 0.5 Reflectivity with 1-minute Cloud to Ground ENTLN lightning Plot overlayed. Keep in mind, the GLM data has a parallax error.
-Kevin
Upper Left: 1-minute GLM Flash Extend Density
Upper Right: 1-minute GLM Average Flash Area
Lower Right: 1-minute GLM Total Energy
Lower Left: 0.5 Reflectivity with 1-minute Cloud to Ground ENTLN lightning Plot overlayed.
Upper Left: Notice the one area with a higher Flash Extend Density. It's indicative of a stronger, consistent updraft. There is more mixing of the charges going on, which is helping to generate more lightning activity.
Upper Right: Notice the area where the higher updraft should be. It has a general lower flash area. This is because there there are more flashes happening at a lower threshold due to the mixing of the charges. However, there is the occasional jump in area (a brighter color). This is because charge increases over time in the anvil. Then, when lightning happens in the anvil, it has more charge.
Lower Right: Notice the energy is higher where there is more lightning activity, generally near the updraft. It's like viewing the overall wattage of the storm using a high-speed camera.
Lower Left: 0.5 Reflectivity with 1-minute Cloud to Ground ENTLN lightning Plot overlayed. Keep in mind, the GLM data has a parallax error.
-Kevin
Second Warning in DDC Utilizing ProbSevere
For the second storm, probabilities increased to 84% with MESH only at 0.41". Similar to the first storm, probabilities were high despite the lower MESH given a favorable environment and lightning. Given my experience with the first storm (low MESH but high ProbSevere probabilities), the increasing probabilities in this situation led me to issue a severe thunderstorm warning, again slightly earlier than I may have based on the all tilts depiction. This storm went on to produce severe hail.
- Bucky
A few quick ProbSevere All Hazards Comments from a Forecaster
With such a busy afternoon of severe weather over the WFOs of interest, I was able to ask a forecaster if he had any comments on performance of ProbSevere All Hazards so far today. He said, "it is performing very well and I am very happy to see ProbSevere All Hazards performing well with left moving supercells after storm splits, as often algorithms struggle with these types of storms". He also added, "I was going to severe warning on this right moving supercell, and noticed ProbSevere All Hazards probability of tornado was up to 40%, while I wasn't confident enough to go tornado warning, I added the tornado possible tag to my severe warning".
-J. Sieglaff
-J. Sieglaff
First Thoughts in CYS (Cheyenne, WY)
NUCAPS plan view parameters are inconsistent both spatially and temporally. For instance, 19Z pass omitted just about all of the CONUS.
NUCAPS modified and unmodified DB soundings are identical.
AllSkyLAP CAPE product appears to be underestimating instability across the domain area of sern WY/nwrn CO
ProbSevere with First Storm in DDC
ProbSevere was utilized in DDC as an overlay on base radar reflectivity. The progression of probabilities is displayed in the animation and individual images below. From 2008 to 2010 UTC, ProbHail jumped from 39% to 58%, based on a slight increase in MESH from 0.40" to 0.51". and flash rates increasing from 6 to 16. From 2010 to 2012, ProbHail increased to 95% and MESH to 0.73" and flash rate to 34. This is valuable to note: Despite MESH still well below 1", ProbSevere is at 95%, indicating high likelihood of severe (hail in this case). A key driver being favorable lightning in a favorable shear environment. The rapid trend up in probs combined with high probs helped to provide confidence in the warning decision. This despite the fact that MESH was still well under 1", and the reflectivity core was still on it's way up, but not quite to where I would want it for my typical warning decision. This storm quickly produced melting 1" hail, and later 1.5" hail.
- Bucky
Experimental Tornado Warning in Hastings, NE
One forecaster in the Hastings, NE WFO issued an experimental tornado warning based on his interrogation of base velocity data at 2137 UTC 01 May 2018. The forecaster noted the ProbSevere All Hazards probability of tornado was low (9%) at the time he decided to issue the warning (2134 UTC), but then jumped to 40% in the following scan (see Figure 1). The probability of tornado values continued to increase into the 60% range. The forecaster commented, he realized the rotation increase he noted in base data took a few minutes to be captured in the MRMS AzShear fields and hence ProbSevere All Hazards. In this case he said the probability of tornado confirmed his decision to warn and it gave him confidence in the probability of tornado, but to keep aware of the latency in base data into derived products. This storm did produce a brief tornado shortly after the warning issuance.
-J. Sieglaff
![]() |
| Figure 1. KUEX 0.5 degree storm-relative velocity and ProbSevere All Hazards probability of tornado contours over Nebraska 2132-2142 UTC 01 May 2018. |
-J. Sieglaff
Labels:
EWP,
EWP interactions,
ProbSevereAllHazards
Convective Initiation in Dodge
Convection initiated along the dry line in northern DDC after 1930 UTC. Referring to the two-panel animation below, initiation is clearly evident in the 1-min visible imagery based on vertical cloud growth and the appearance of a shadow and anvil. Cooling was also obvious in the 1-min IR (not shown). In the bottom panel of the figure is the 5-min convective initiation algorithm overlaid on VIS. The CI algorithm did not successfully capture any of the initiation along the dry line, despite clear skies. In this case, the CI algorithm provided no value.
- Bucky
DDC non-warn decision
A group of storms intensified across the southern portion of DDC area. Updrafts weren't terribly organized but near criteria for reflectivity above -20C. ProbSVR exceeded 50% but never topped 70% before decreasing. This agreed well with base data interrogation. GLM Lightning also went to 6 on FED before decreasing again. Similar to what happened with the earlier storm that was severe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















