G16 and G17 Flash Extent Comparison

Showing a quick comparison of G16  and G17 Flash Extent Density over srn Texas.
Takeaways - some "minor" changes in Flash Extent absolute values but trends are similar.  Quick look - had higher values than G17.  Also, parallax is different - but to be expected.  Overall - think both products could be used interchangeably across TX.

The Evolution of an Intensifying Cluster

Storms in the EWX CWA early in the shift were generally remaining sub-severe, with what looked to be heavy rain as the dominant threat. The first two loops (below), the storms were riding right along the gradient of the PWATs and CAPE. (continues below)



As the cluster of storms reached the eastern edge of a greater area of instability (below), the concern then turned to how much of the instability would be tapped into and how storms would react, with the thought that they'd likely become more robust. (continues below)



Attention was then turned to how the GLM was observing the evolution of the stronger cluster of storms within the northeastern portion of the CWA. I created a four-panel display, with MFA overlaid onto the mesosector visby imagery (upper left, below), clean IR with TOE overlaid (upper right; I had blinking enabled to capture the highest fJ, but is unseen in this GIF), Event Density with Group Centroid Density overlaid (bottom right, below), and FED with Flash Centroid Density overlaid (bottom right, below). It was fascinating to watch how the lightning unfolded with this particular cluster, and the MFA in particular immediately drew my eye to the storms moving toward the FWD CWA border. The smaller flashes began to blossom and expand out, which then had me look at the TOE and density products. The density products ramped up, but what I found the most interesting is that the MFA seemed to give me that initial clue that this storm was in fact tapping into some of the higher instability and allowing for the updraft(s) to intensify.



I then proceeded to take a look at the MRMS LL AzShear product (below), wistfully wishing I could look at the single radar version of this product. Sure enough, a clear signature developed, highlighting the amplifying wind within this cluster.



Last but not least, looking at ProbSevere, the ProbWind product picked up well on this signature, highlighted below.



Conclusion: I'm continuing to see some promise that there's something to look deeper into with respect to these additional lightning products, particularly the MFA when used in combination of something like the Event or Flash Extend Density products. There seemed to be a good correlation with the TOE, as anticipated, but I'm still unsure about its utility as a stand-alone product. As for the Average Flash Area, I didn't even pull it up given the limited amount of screen space I had and what I saw yesterday, with the AFA in particular not giving me hope of being able to gather good info/lead time in comparison to the MFA.

~Gritty

Side note: Had some excellent conversation with the GLM expert in the room and as we were talking and analyzing some of these products, it was noticed that there was quite an extensive channel, lightning that shot out well to the north of this cluster of focus. These GLM products could provide beneficial information when providing DSS to partners, such as letting partners and the public know not to go back outside just because there's either light rain or the storm had already passed.

Tornadic Supercell and AzShear and ProbTor Ramp-Up

The storm along the Milam/Burleson county line began to wrap up showing increasing Merged 0-2km AzShear and a stronger velocity signature. From 2204z - 2208z there was a brief couplet from this storm and the FWD and HGX offices, and the HWT forecasters all tornado warned this storm. You can see the Spectrum Width maxima at the point of the couplet and along the leading edge of the bowing segment to the south of the couplet. There is also an inflow notch as well all situation near the bookend vortex. The big thing to note is how the AzShear Merged product ramped up from 2154z to 2204z. This also impacted ProbTor. The trend went from:

• 2149z: ProbTor 11%
• 2154z: ProbTor 60%
• 2159z-2206z: ProbTor 84%
• 2208z-2212z: ProbTor 86% (2207z is when WFO FWD issued their warning)

ProbTor maxed out at 87% from 2216z-2218z while the couplet became less gate-to-gate. If you used a ProbTor threshhold of 60% that would have given 15 minute additional minutes of lead time, while a threshold of 80% would have given approximately 8 more minutes of lead time. As of writing this blog (2240z) there are no LSRs reporting anything in terms of damage or tornadoes with this storm.

-Alexander T.

GLM Products Identify Hook Echo

In our NWS Corpus Christi Warned Storm (ACTUAL NWS CC) The GLM did a fantastic job of identifying the rain wrapped hook echo. I've attached visuals and corresponding velocity. Just thought it was pretty neat. The satellite and radar imagery was a little too busy to define it as nicely as the GLM did.

-lakeeffect

ProbSevere Large Areas Impacting Threat Percentages

With this storm going through Milam and Burleson Counties in South Central Texas ProbSevere is saying 90%+ for ProbWind and only like 15% ProbTor. One possible reason for the lower ProbTor may be the large area that ProbSevere is tracking as one storm. Yes, it certainly is one large bowing line segment, but if you look at the AzShear Merged data in the lower right you can see localized maxima in Milam County. While there is not a defined couplet at this point there is some bookend vortex action going on in the area of the AzShear maxima. If the ProbSevere was broken into two different areas would the ProbTor and/or ProbWind be even higher for the Milam County storm due to the locally higher AzShear? I would say probably so! Because ProbSevere is encompassing the entire line segment the values of AzShear going into ProbSevere are probably dampened some from the less active southern part of the storm.



-Alexander T.

HGX Mesoanalysis

Storms are approaching the HGX CWA. GOES-16 imagery shows amply cumulus development across much of the CWA. With temps in the upper 70s and dew points in the upper 60, I expect there to be ample instability in this environment.



All Sky LAPS retrievals indicate ML CAPE just shy of 1000 J/kg, but with this environment, I would expect instability to be higher.



The modified NUCAPS shows a profile more in line with what I would expect to see. In this profile, the surface dew points were close to what surface obs show, but the surface temp did need to be adjusted up a bit. This sounding, coupled with analyzed deep layer shear, leads me to think severe weather is a possibility in this area.

Sandor Clegane

GLM MFA for Storm re-generation

GLM Minimum Flash Area showed some utility in boosting lead time for storm re-generation. The storm in the center of the first image had started to weaken a bit after moving off of the outflow boundary that initiated it.



The storm continues to show no new updraft development in the sat imagery as well as MFA product.



At 20:29 GLM MFA begins to indicate that there may be a new updraft forming as it interacts with a differential heating boundary/outflow from the leading storm.



Over the next 20 minutes the updraft continues to strengthen as the storm becomes more robust. The MFA led the visible satellite depiction of the new updraft by 2-4 min. This could be useful when trying to decide whether to continue warnings or not.

GLM Assist In DSS

The below image shows GOES-16 day cloud convection (DCC) beneath GLM Minimum Flash Area (MFA). Point F is a DSS event. DCC shows clouds glaciating a county upstream of our DSS event, with the storm becoming electrified shortly after glaciation per MFA. This prompted a call to the emergency manager providing support for the DSS event letting them know that lightning was imminent.

ENI total lightning also shows lightning (white points), but the point data fails to show the extent of the lightning, which may lead decision makers to think that they have more time to react to the approaching lightning than they actually do.



Sandor Clegane

ProbSevere Trend Tracker

ProbSevere has been very useful over the years.   One desirable feature would be to have a "trend tracker" see the example from WFO MPX.  It sounds like work is being done on this endeavor?

Waiting on convection - diagnosis and investigation of products

Corpus Christi --
In investigating the environment we've deemed the convection to be more or less dependent on synoptic forcing via the cold front dropping southeast.

A



In A, plotted is Total Precipitable Water along with SPC Convective Outlook and analyzed fronts. A couple of things can be noted: TPW is very high under the Slight Risk, and it is displayed very nicely with good resolution contained within the gradient. This is a good example without going into too much detail about how our environment is primed for severe weather. However, NUCAPS Gridded Data has not come into our area as of 20z. This makes it hard to test the product and how it captures the boundary layer. 

Now, we wait.

B



As we wait for the cold front to drop SE, our attention is focused on convection happening in NE Mexico (pictured in B). These cells popped up right along the CAPE boundary between values of 300 j/kg to 1500 j/kg.

C



As can be seen in C, the GLM has indicated these storms contain lightning, thus they are intensifying in nature. We will now be monitoring the hail threat.

-lakeeffect