The 2018 Satellite Proving Ground Spring Experiment is underway at the HWT in Norman. A great group of forecasters are here this week to provide feedback on current and future satellite related products. Today's groups will be operating in the Cheyenne, Wyoming and Lubbock, Texas CWAs.
-Michael Bowlan
Monday, April 30, 2018
Wednesday, April 4, 2018
Severe storm outbreak in the Mississippi and Ohio River Valleys
A potent shortwave forced severe storms across the middle of the U.S. yesterday, wreaking havoc from Texas to Ohio. Below is the 850mb analysis from 00Z 04/04/2018 (Figure 1), showing well-defined warm and cold fronts emanating from the low, centered on Lake Michigan. We also see that moisture was well-established in the warm sector and the flow at 850mb was quite strong (30-40 kts).
With sampling turned on in AWIPS2 (Figure 3), users of ProbHail can see the constituent predictors. Here, the strong satellite growth rate, high MRMS MESH (1.5"), and high Earth Networks® total lightning flash rate (40 fl/min) contributed to a ProbHail of 96%. NWP predictors of effective bulk shear, CAPE between -10C and -30C ("hail cape"), precipitable water (PWAT), and the lowest height of the wetbulb 0C isotherm are also used as inputs in ProbHail.
Storms later evolved into big wind-producers, evidenced by these storms in the Nashville, TN area. There were many reports of trees and power lines down in the metro area around 0200-0230Z.
ProbWind was in the 50-70% range for these storms, owing to a strong MeanWind in the 1-3km layer and moderate 0-2km MRMS AzShear. Note that the ProbWind readout in AWIPS2 now has a "weak", "moderate", and "strong" designation tag for the MRMS AzShear fields (e.g., Figure 9)
![]() |
| Figure 1: 850mb analysis from 00Z 04/04/2018. |
The NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere model is experimenting with hazard-specific models: ProbHail, ProbWind, and ProbTor. The ProbHail model did fairly well to capture the initial hail threat along the cold front, with numerous storms exhibiting strong satellite growth from GOES-16.
These storms produced numerous hail reports between 1" and 1.5" in and around the Mark Twain National Forest.
![]() |
| Figure 2: ProbHail for storms in eastern MO, with MRMS MergedReflectivity and NWS severe weather warnings. |
![]() |
| Figure 3: ProbHail readout for storms in eastern MO, with MRMS MergedReflectivity and NWS severe weather warnings. |
Due to very favorable kinematics, the tornado threat was rather high, with the Storm Prediction Center issuing a wide swath of 10% probabilities for tornadoes within 25 mi of a location for their 2000Z outlook (Figure 4).
![]() |
| Figure 4: SPC tornado outlook and verification for 20Z and 12Z, respectively. |
A storm that produced numerous reports of significant wind damage in the Dayton, OH metro area also produced a tornado east of the metro. ProbTor captured it's development well (Figure 5).
![]() |
| Figure 5: ProbSevere, MRMS MergedReflectivity, and NWS severe weather warnings for southwest OH. |
The time series of this storm's attributes demonstrate that very high MRMS 0-2km AzShear (>20 * 0.001 /s), along with SRH of 300-400 m2/s2 in the 0-1km layer helped spike the ProbTor value to over 90%. In this case, the tornado report came slightly after the time of peak ProbTor. Several wind reports in the Dayton area were significant (e.g., "large debris cloud", "structural damage to homes"), around 20Z when ProbTor was in the 30-50% range. Thus, it's possible there may have been a tornado earlier (a NWS survey should confirm the presence or lack thereof).
![]() |
| Figure 6: Time series of ProbTor (red curve) for this storm with its predictors. The bottom axes show NWS warnings and reports. |
The "ProbSevere" value simply uses the maximum of ProbHail, ProbWind, and ProbTor. For this long-lived storm, each model was the maximum at different times. Regardless, the ProbSevere values were mostly over 70% when there was reported severe weather. The MESH and lightning (pink and green curves) show the cycling of this storm nicely. The storm produced hail and wind reports in the Columbus, OH metro and later east of the metro.
![]() |
| Figure 7: Time series of ProbSevere (red curve) for this storm with its predictors. The bottom axes show NWS warnings and reports. |
Storms later evolved into big wind-producers, evidenced by these storms in the Nashville, TN area. There were many reports of trees and power lines down in the metro area around 0200-0230Z.
![]() |
| Figure 8: ProbWind, MRMS MergedReflectivity, and NWS severe weather warnings for storms affecting the Nashville metro. |
![]() |
| Figure 9: ProbWind readout for a storm south of Nashville. |
At the end of each day, we make an "accumulation" product, plotting the centroids of storms colored by their ProbSevere value (or ProbTor value), along with the NWS severe weather warnings and SPC preliminary reports. From Figure 10, we see that ProbSevere corresponded with severe weather warnings and reports quite well in MO, AR, IL, IN, OH, KY, PA, and TN, and parts of TX and LA. However, many wind reports were missed (at the 50% threshold) in MS, AL, and GA. Many of these storms had meager reflectivity and lightning flash rates, and no discernible satellite growth. ProbWind was largely 10-30% for these storms, a small improvement over the legacy "all-in-one" ProbSevere product, which had < 10% for most of these storms. We are still working to improve upon probabilistic prediction of storms in this regime, and are open to ideas from the field.
Monday, March 12, 2018
Daylight Savings storms
As we mindlessly set our clocks ahead one hour, storms raged on in the southern U.S. A shortwave in the polar jet stream plunged southward over the Plains to force strong convection along a 500mb jet streak in eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas. The NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere model is moving toward hazard-specific statistical models using MRMS, GOES-ABI series, lightning, and NWP data. ProbHail, ProbWind, and ProbTor will be evaluated for a second year at the NSSL Hazardous Weather Testbed.
This storm northwest of Fort Smith, AR, shot up in ProbSevere value (the probability of severe is simply the maximum of the ProbHail, ProbWind, and ProbTor values) between 21:30Z and 21:40Z, going from 18% to about 50%. Golfball sized hail was recorded at 21:40Z. The increasing MESH (though still less than 1.0") spiked the ProbSevere value, while a jump in the total lightning flash rate increased the ProbSevere value from 65% to over 90% later on (see a time series of this storm's attributes in Fig 2). Interestingly, the 3-6km AzShear was very high before the lightning or MESH really took off, indicating strong mid-level rotation. The storm later recorded 2.0" hail east of Fort Smith. ProbHail had the highest probability for any of the models throughout the duration of the storm.
During the daylight savings time switch, another set of storms forced by a strong subtropical jet stream and moist southerly return flow from the Gulf of Mexico made their way from eastern Texas into Louisiana. The monster supercell in Figures 3 and 4 had a strong normalized satellite growth rate (4.1%/min observed by GOES-16) prior to 03:00Z. The growth rate brought the probability to about 20%, where the MESH and flash rate catapulted the ProbHail value from 20% to 90% in about 20 min. The storm had ProbHail and ProbWind exceeding 85-95%, recording numerous hail and wind reports, while ProbTor peaked at 20% (there were no tornado reports).
This storm northwest of Fort Smith, AR, shot up in ProbSevere value (the probability of severe is simply the maximum of the ProbHail, ProbWind, and ProbTor values) between 21:30Z and 21:40Z, going from 18% to about 50%. Golfball sized hail was recorded at 21:40Z. The increasing MESH (though still less than 1.0") spiked the ProbSevere value, while a jump in the total lightning flash rate increased the ProbSevere value from 65% to over 90% later on (see a time series of this storm's attributes in Fig 2). Interestingly, the 3-6km AzShear was very high before the lightning or MESH really took off, indicating strong mid-level rotation. The storm later recorded 2.0" hail east of Fort Smith. ProbHail had the highest probability for any of the models throughout the duration of the storm.
![]() |
| Fig. 1: ProbSevere contours, MRMS MergedReflectivityComposite for a storm in eastern OK / western AR. NWS severe weather warnings are also plotted. |
![]() |
| Fig. 2: Time series of ProbSevere (max of ProbHail, ProbWind, and ProbTor) for the storm in OR/AR, with a subset of contributing predictors. |
![]() |
| Fig. 3: ProbSevere, MRMS MergedReflectivityComposite and associated NWS severe weather warnings for a storm in east TX. |
![]() |
| Fig. 4: Time series of ProbSevere (max of ProbHail, ProbWind, and ProbTor) for the supercell in east TX, with a subset of contributing predictors. |
Thursday, December 21, 2017
Late December storms
A negatively-tilted shortwave brought some low-level moisture return to the gulf states this week, and with the moisture, some scattered severe storms.
A couple tornadic storms affected portions of east Texas. The NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere model now incorporates the GOES-16 satellite growth rates, and a storm affecting Cherokee Co., TX, had a strong normalized growth well before it produced severe weather.
The ProbWind values vacillated largely between 50% and 75% for this storm, before producing a tornado at 00:56 UTC and multiple wind damage reports in the town or Rusk, TX. The strong GOES-16 vertical growth rate, large ENI flash rate (~30-70 fl/min), and stout kinematic fields (eff. bulk shear ~ 45-50 kts; meanwind 700-900mb ~ 35 kts) combined to produce these moderate-strong ProbWind values. The MRMS MESH remained rather low (~ 0.2 - 0.6 in), signaling that this was not a severe hail situation. ProbTor had a maximum value of 12% before the first tornado report.
This storm featured jumps in ProbWind value (one produced by a large increase in flash rate, indicative of a lightning jump), and being an outlier storm amongst its neighbors, in terms of probability value. Both features in ProbSevere objects have been identified by forecasters as indicating possible severe weather.
A second storm formed further south and later in the night, which also produced a damaging tornado, touching down northeast of Beaumont, TX, and later northwest of Lake Charles, LA, blowing off the roof to a restaurant.
The kinematics for this storm were very favorable, with effective bulk shear of 50 kts, meanwind 700-900mb of 45 kts, and 0-1 km storm-relative helicity near 300 J/kg. The first tornado touched down at 07:41 UTC, when ProbTor was about 30%. ProbTor then jumped from 30% to 50% at 08:00 UTC, the time of the second tornado report. This jump in ProbTor value was coincident with an increase in total lightning (a lightning jump) as well as an increase in low-level rotation.
A tornado warning was issued at 08:10 UTC, when ProbTor had just increased to 90%. The third tornado reported, at 08:20 UTC, was rated EF1 and destroyed the roof of a restaurant in DeQuincy, Louisiana.
A couple tornadic storms affected portions of east Texas. The NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere model now incorporates the GOES-16 satellite growth rates, and a storm affecting Cherokee Co., TX, had a strong normalized growth well before it produced severe weather.
![]() |
| Figure 1: AWIPS2 screen captures of MRMS MergedReflectivity, ProbSevere contours, and NWS warnings for a storm near Rusk, Texas. |
This storm featured jumps in ProbWind value (one produced by a large increase in flash rate, indicative of a lightning jump), and being an outlier storm amongst its neighbors, in terms of probability value. Both features in ProbSevere objects have been identified by forecasters as indicating possible severe weather.
A second storm formed further south and later in the night, which also produced a damaging tornado, touching down northeast of Beaumont, TX, and later northwest of Lake Charles, LA, blowing off the roof to a restaurant.
![]() |
| Figure 2: AWIPS2 screen captures of MRMS MergedReflectivity, ProbSevere contours, and NWS warnings for storm heading into southwest Louisiana. |
![]() |
| Figure 3: Time series of ProbTor and predictor values for this storm affecting southeast TX and southwest LA. |
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Spartanburg, SC Tornadoes
A potent October shortwave traversed the southern U.S. on October 23rd, bringing with it a round of severe weather to the Southeast U.S. The Storm Prediction Center outlook had a 5% contour for tornadoes (Figure 1; probability of a tornado within 25 miles of a given point), citing very strong low-level shear and weak to moderate buoyancy.
Convection took on a linear storm mode in South Carolina, with a surge in a line heading toward Spartanburg (Figure 2). The NOAA/CIMSS ProbTor model increased to over 80% by 18:20Z, owing to increases in low and mid level azimuthal shear, and a jump in total lightning density, while residing in an environment with excellent 0-1km storm relative helicity (Figure 3).
The first tornado reported was at 18:54Z, coincident with the first NWS tornado warning. The first tornado damaged permanent and mobile homes, downed power lines, and destroyed a horse barn. Later, the storm produced another tornado between downtown Spartanburg and I-26, snapping large trees, as ProbTor was about 45%. After dropping below 20%, ProbTor again increased to 40% at 19:36Z, when another tornado was reported near the North/South Carolina border.
In this case, ProbTor may have been able to provide an earlier "heads up" to forecasters monitoring the storms for potential tornadic activity. ProbTor is best utilized in conjunction with current warning practices and interrogation of base radar data. If a velocity couplet is outside of the ProbTor object polygon, ProbTor will be underestimated, as may have been the case for a second tornadic storm in North Carolina on this day.
![]() |
| Fig.1: SPC tornado outlook issued at 16Z 10/23/2017. |
Convection took on a linear storm mode in South Carolina, with a surge in a line heading toward Spartanburg (Figure 2). The NOAA/CIMSS ProbTor model increased to over 80% by 18:20Z, owing to increases in low and mid level azimuthal shear, and a jump in total lightning density, while residing in an environment with excellent 0-1km storm relative helicity (Figure 3).
| Fig. 2: ProbSevere (all hazards) contours, NWS warnings, MRMS MergedReflectivity, GOES visible reflectance. The ProbTor was the highest hazard probability for this storm; 88% at this time. |
The first tornado reported was at 18:54Z, coincident with the first NWS tornado warning. The first tornado damaged permanent and mobile homes, downed power lines, and destroyed a horse barn. Later, the storm produced another tornado between downtown Spartanburg and I-26, snapping large trees, as ProbTor was about 45%. After dropping below 20%, ProbTor again increased to 40% at 19:36Z, when another tornado was reported near the North/South Carolina border.
![]() |
| Fig. 3: Time series of ProbTor (thick red line), with constituent predictors. NWS warnings and preliminary LSR reports are on bottom axes. |
Friday, July 21, 2017
2017 Experiment Complete
The 2017 GOES-R/JPSS Experiment in the HWT is wrapping up today. This has been a great experiment this year with getting to utilize live GOES-16 data in operations here in the testbed. Also we were able to demonstrate GLM lightning data to forecasters for the very first time and have gotten a lot of valuable feedback from forecasters on what they would like to see operationally form the GLM in terms of display capabilities. Feedback from the fourth and final week of the experiment is posted below:
GLM
Get the parallax fixed before fielding
Forecasters will be confused between events, groups, and flashes and what each means and why they are useful
The Stano color curve would be the best default
Being able to monitor trends would be the most useful
A pop up time series like a pop up skew t could be very useful
Training seemed to be pretty good for preparing people
Seeing the spatial extent is a very useful quality of GLM
Another big utility is for monitoring electrification before the other networks can
Don’t see people using it too much if the parallax displacement is still an issue when fielded
NUCAPS
Useful information yesterday out of the gridded products when there was clearing in the area
Obviously most useful for pre-convective environment and getting an early afternoon pass over the area
Overall the experimental product seemed more useful, but there were times that the operational seemed to be a better representation of the environment.
The yellow dots seemed to be somewhat reasonable at times and can have some useful information
As long as people understand how the modifications in the experimental profile are made, they can be extremely useful
Like having both the experimental and the operational soundings to compare the atmospheres
Repeating the latency problem which is the biggest hurdle to operational use
Would be nice to be able to have some automated products produced from NUCAPS profiles
ABI
Understand the RGBs a lot better now than before
Found a couple really useful ones for operations
There were some very useful RGBs for convective applications
RGBs seem to bog systems down in some offices when trying to load
Training should concentrate on best practices and what the colors mean for application
Training needs to be heavily focused on operational benefits
Daytime Cloud Phase RGB seemed to be one that should be introduced first, especially this time of year for convective development
CAPE is still a problem, being consistently too low
Derived Winds should be color coded by pressure level instead of wind speed and steering clear reg, green, yellow type color combinations
ProbSevere
Useful for situational awareness
Good tool for monitoring trends and keeping an eye on storms of interest
ProbTor was useful for seeing storms that were different from any of the other storms
ProbHail was more restrained and seemed to reduce FAR from being too high from relying solely on MESH
Still struggles with wind events and tracking of linear features
-Michael Bowlan
GOES-R Liaison at SPC/HWT
Thursday, July 20, 2017
Storms came into NW SD, barely
-tvguy
Line of storms were weaker on the southern half of the line coming in from MT... even though environment indicated some strengthening should occur. Due to 60 dbZ reflectivity at 15Kft, and increase in velocities >30 kt issued SVR for extreme NW corner of Harding Co for low end wind, hail threat. ProbSevere was not impressed, with 11% hail and 9% hail. But I'm not sure this tells the whole story, given strength of storms to the north and potential development of outflow winds as well as elevated reflectivities suggested a greater hail threat than advertised. Chose to discount the negativity of ProbSevere, with additional concern about data quality at such a long distance from the UDX 88D.
As warning about to expire, received LSR of 50 mph. Non-severe. But then velocities really picked up along the line, up to +57 kts. Due to strenthening, reissued along the line for much of that county (Harding).
Even though ProbSevere values were very low... under 10% on all parameters... the storm did produce highway sensor value of 62 mph. Kind of thinking the ProbSevere object is created by reflectivity core, but doesn't consider the stronger wind values created out ahead of that storm -- or, perhaps there are latency issues due to data processing. I don't know.
Finally, saw convergence signature (64 kts) on southern part of line. Upon expiration, reissued farther to the SE for line of windmakers.
Line of storms were weaker on the southern half of the line coming in from MT... even though environment indicated some strengthening should occur. Due to 60 dbZ reflectivity at 15Kft, and increase in velocities >30 kt issued SVR for extreme NW corner of Harding Co for low end wind, hail threat. ProbSevere was not impressed, with 11% hail and 9% hail. But I'm not sure this tells the whole story, given strength of storms to the north and potential development of outflow winds as well as elevated reflectivities suggested a greater hail threat than advertised. Chose to discount the negativity of ProbSevere, with additional concern about data quality at such a long distance from the UDX 88D.
As warning about to expire, received LSR of 50 mph. Non-severe. But then velocities really picked up along the line, up to +57 kts. Due to strenthening, reissued along the line for much of that county (Harding).
Even though ProbSevere values were very low... under 10% on all parameters... the storm did produce highway sensor value of 62 mph. Kind of thinking the ProbSevere object is created by reflectivity core, but doesn't consider the stronger wind values created out ahead of that storm -- or, perhaps there are latency issues due to data processing. I don't know.
Finally, saw convergence signature (64 kts) on southern part of line. Upon expiration, reissued farther to the SE for line of windmakers.
ND 1 min imagery
Can see what looks to be lower level inflow into the main area of severe thunderstorms. This indicates to us that the storm is maintaining intensity. This, along with radar and PROBSevere data has led us to continue our warnings
Missing gridded NUCAPS data in complex terrain?
I noticed there were a lot of mixing pixels in the NUCAPS gridded data over the Black Hills despite the fact there was no notable cloud cover. Expanding west, it became apparent this was a common theme across Western Montana into central Idaho as well. Sounding availability overlays show most of these area are considered yellow. It seemed many of these points were areas where there was a gradient between darker forested areas in the terrain, and lower adjacent valley locations. For locations in the west, for this data to be useful and for us to have confidence in using it, we really need a more complete data set. A sounding from the Black Hill is shown at the bottom, which seems meteorologically reasonable.
-64BoggsLites
ND Convection along Warm Front
Finally have CI across the western portion of the CWA. Forcing is largely along the warm frontal boundary at this time, with two notable cells. Still monitoring the potential for initiation along the dryline. Have opted to continue the warning on the cell mentioned in the previous post given a combination of radar, satellite, and environmental data. 1 minute imagery is now in for the area: seeing near steady thick ice in the clouds associated with the isolated cells (which includes the warned cell), but not really beginning to see the cu along the dryline becoming more agitated.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






























