Below are the 15 UTC simulated ABI brightness temperatures (top) and observed GOES brightness temperatures (bottom). The consensus of the forecasters on the CI desk was the NSSL-WRF had excellent placement of the upper level vorticity as depicted by the water vapor channels. On the other hand, the NSSL-WRF struggled to capture the intensity and magnitude of a band of clouds and decaying convection over the Upper Mississippi Valley/western Great Lakes. The images below show the GOES observed clouds are much more expansive and have colder brightness temperatures than the simulated ABI clouds from the NSSL-WRF. Discussion is ongoing on how these clouds will impact convective initiation timing and location later today.
FLASH utility to toggle between images
No comments:
Post a Comment