-Alexander T.
Thursday, April 25, 2019
Large ProbSevere Blob
Here is one drawback of ProbSevere that has been briefly discussed. The areal extent of the identification is not based off of some of the features that feed into it, but rather the dBZ reflectivity representation. In this case, for a MCV and line of storms, the blob below is approximately 152 miles long using a center line to calculate the distance. ProbSevere kept this size of storm for two 2 minute calculations before breaking the storms apart into several different identifications.
-Alexander T.
-Alexander T.
NUCAPS – UNMODIFIED VS MODIFIED
Compared the NUCAPS sounding today (4/25) over WFO TAE. See the point evaluated below (labeled point A below):
This is the “unmodified sounding.” Overall the thermodynamic profile looked realistic. Looking in the PBL – noticed it was about 2C too warm and about 2C to dry.
This is the “modified sounding.” As expected, no change to the mid level thermo profile. The PBL did have the “correction” applied – not the “cliff” in the temp profile. Overall, I was expecting a more sophisticated PBL nudging scheme. In reality – it just appeared to force the T/TD from the nearest METAR, with maybe some minor smoothing. This is something a forecaster could do in about 30 sec – so didnt gain much.
BETTER OPTION: employ a more sophisticated nudging scheme to the nearest RAP/HRRR. If you going to modify the sounding – might as well nudge it to a model analysis – which have a long history of being used in severe wx research.
TAE Mesoanalysis #1
Forcing and storms remain well to the west of our CWA, but the atmosphere is becoming primed for strong to severe storms later this afternoon. LAPS All Sky retrievals show that ML instability has been steadily building, reaching roughly 500 J/kg along the Gulf coast.
An 8 hour loop shows how the instability has built and gives more confidence that instability will continue to build ahead of the storms to our west. 
We did feel that LAPS CAPE seemed a bit underdone given the intensity of the downstream of the convection, so we took a look at the latest NUCAPS retrievals. We examined the point in the extreme SE of our CWA.
The boundary layer on the unadjusted sounding required some adjustment to match the nearest obs, but overall, seemed to capture the general profile well. I was initially skeptical about the warm nose just above 700mb, but a similar feature was evident on the 12z sounding from TAE. This feature may have an impact on storm intensity and potential hazards, and it would be particularly helpful to see how this feature changes over time.
Sandor Clegane
An 8 hour loop shows how the instability has built and gives more confidence that instability will continue to build ahead of the storms to our west. We did feel that LAPS CAPE seemed a bit underdone given the intensity of the downstream of the convection, so we took a look at the latest NUCAPS retrievals. We examined the point in the extreme SE of our CWA.The boundary layer on the unadjusted sounding required some adjustment to match the nearest obs, but overall, seemed to capture the general profile well. I was initially skeptical about the warm nose just above 700mb, but a similar feature was evident on the 12z sounding from TAE. This feature may have an impact on storm intensity and potential hazards, and it would be particularly helpful to see how this feature changes over time.Sandor Clegane
Long Flash via GLM in the Anvil / Stratiform Region
GLM does a good job at capturing large flashes that appear in the stratiform region behind lines of storms. In this case looking at the Total Optical Energy for 5 minutes with 1 minute updates you can see the large flash show up (the yellows and the whites). Reflectivity from KMOB and Visible satellite are layers under the TOE data.
This large flash has Minimum Flash Area values between 1100-1700 km^2 with the Average Flash Area anywhere between 2700-3600 km^2. This is a large flash that extends back into the stratiform region (the Anvil) of the cumulonimbus clouds. You can see the lighter precipitation on the RALA (Reflectivity at Lowest Altitude) product below. The darker blocky outlined area is the Average Flash Size with other variables in the 4 panel.
One important operator note is to be careful what you time match with the GLM lightning data. In this case another forecaster had time matched with the 1 minute meso-sector of satellite and because of errors in that data the large anvil flash was skipped in the one minute GLM data. If the GLM data is the focus of your analysis always remember to time match with it and then use other data (like satellite or radar) on those time scales.
-Alexander T.
This large flash has Minimum Flash Area values between 1100-1700 km^2 with the Average Flash Area anywhere between 2700-3600 km^2. This is a large flash that extends back into the stratiform region (the Anvil) of the cumulonimbus clouds. You can see the lighter precipitation on the RALA (Reflectivity at Lowest Altitude) product below. The darker blocky outlined area is the Average Flash Size with other variables in the 4 panel.
One important operator note is to be careful what you time match with the GLM lightning data. In this case another forecaster had time matched with the 1 minute meso-sector of satellite and because of errors in that data the large anvil flash was skipped in the one minute GLM data. If the GLM data is the focus of your analysis always remember to time match with it and then use other data (like satellite or radar) on those time scales.
-Alexander T.
Week 1 Day 4 Operations
Today will be our last day of operations for the week as we continue to follow a low across the southern U.S. Today we will be in southern Alabama and the Florida Panhandle.
-Michael
-Michael
Wednesday, April 24, 2019
AllSky Indices
Of the indices below, there is some utility in these products, although did not find the Total Totals Index to be of much use considering there were warned storms with verification within HGX's CWA. The K Index seemed to be the most useful, with the Lifted Index product showing the storms once again riding along a gradient.
~Gritty
~Gritty
The Aggie Tornado From a Shower
PRIOR to the Milam/Burleson County tornado warnings that you can read about below in other blog posts there was a tornado near the Texas A&M Campus in College Station. See these tweets:
If you were to zoom into Bryan-College Station though a few things begin to jump out at you. Mainly the high Spectrum Width, the relative maxima in AzShear, and a VERY weak couplet looking signature in velocity (look near the blue Tornado Icon). This is the time that the tornado was reported. The good news is that Spectrum Width picked up on the turbulence in the storm, and AzShear does have a local max, but the values are only 0.007 s^-1 compared to 0.014 s^-1 at the bookend vortex to the west. This scale only goes from 0 to .01 s^-1.
The velocity signature does get slightly better in the 2149z. This is probably a quick spin up due to boundary interaction, but it is shocking that this little SHOWER produce the tornado when the larger storms to the west produced NO reports as of now (0026z). The good news is that there were local maxes in the AzShear and SW, but not enough that these would be your focus of course.
ProbSevere never pinged the storm...and there were other indications in velocity, AzShear, and SW with other showers that were similar to the tornadic College Station storm. Oh the joys of quick spin up tornadoes due to boundary interactions in Central Texas!
-Alexander T.
- https://twitter.com/cgar1999/status/1121171711855034370
- https://twitter.com/jeanette_wx/status/1121171983633350661
- https://twitter.com/KAGSnews/status/1121205013236391938
If you were to zoom into Bryan-College Station though a few things begin to jump out at you. Mainly the high Spectrum Width, the relative maxima in AzShear, and a VERY weak couplet looking signature in velocity (look near the blue Tornado Icon). This is the time that the tornado was reported. The good news is that Spectrum Width picked up on the turbulence in the storm, and AzShear does have a local max, but the values are only 0.007 s^-1 compared to 0.014 s^-1 at the bookend vortex to the west. This scale only goes from 0 to .01 s^-1.
The velocity signature does get slightly better in the 2149z. This is probably a quick spin up due to boundary interaction, but it is shocking that this little SHOWER produce the tornado when the larger storms to the west produced NO reports as of now (0026z). The good news is that there were local maxes in the AzShear and SW, but not enough that these would be your focus of course.
ProbSevere never pinged the storm...and there were other indications in velocity, AzShear, and SW with other showers that were similar to the tornadic College Station storm. Oh the joys of quick spin up tornadoes due to boundary interactions in Central Texas!
-Alexander T.
ProbSevere and GLM Help ID Storm For Severe Warning
ProbSevere and the GLM helped bring may attention to a storm in the northern portion of my CWA. ProbWind began exceeding 50% as the Flash Extent Density began spiking. This led to investigation of base radar data which led to a severe thunderstorm warning.
Sandor Clegane
Sandor Clegane
G16 and G17 Flash Extent Comparison
Showing a quick comparison of G16 and G17 Flash Extent Density over srn Texas.
Takeaways - some "minor" changes in Flash Extent absolute values but trends are similar. Quick look - had higher values than G17. Also, parallax is different - but to be expected. Overall - think both products could be used interchangeably across TX.
Takeaways - some "minor" changes in Flash Extent absolute values but trends are similar. Quick look - had higher values than G17. Also, parallax is different - but to be expected. Overall - think both products could be used interchangeably across TX.
The Evolution of an Intensifying Cluster
Storms in the EWX CWA early in the shift were generally remaining sub-severe, with what looked to be heavy rain as the dominant threat. The first two loops (below), the storms were riding right along the gradient of the PWATs and CAPE. (continues below)
As the cluster of storms reached the eastern edge of a greater area of instability (below), the concern then turned to how much of the instability would be tapped into and how storms would react, with the thought that they'd likely become more robust. (continues below)
Attention was then turned to how the GLM was observing the evolution of the stronger cluster of storms within the northeastern portion of the CWA. I created a four-panel display, with MFA overlaid onto the mesosector visby imagery (upper left, below), clean IR with TOE overlaid (upper right; I had blinking enabled to capture the highest fJ, but is unseen in this GIF), Event Density with Group Centroid Density overlaid (bottom right, below), and FED with Flash Centroid Density overlaid (bottom right, below). It was fascinating to watch how the lightning unfolded with this particular cluster, and the MFA in particular immediately drew my eye to the storms moving toward the FWD CWA border. The smaller flashes began to blossom and expand out, which then had me look at the TOE and density products. The density products ramped up, but what I found the most interesting is that the MFA seemed to give me that initial clue that this storm was in fact tapping into some of the higher instability and allowing for the updraft(s) to intensify.
I then proceeded to take a look at the MRMS LL AzShear product (below), wistfully wishing I could look at the single radar version of this product. Sure enough, a clear signature developed, highlighting the amplifying wind within this cluster.
Last but not least, looking at ProbSevere, the ProbWind product picked up well on this signature, highlighted below.
Conclusion: I'm continuing to see some promise that there's something to look deeper into with respect to these additional lightning products, particularly the MFA when used in combination of something like the Event or Flash Extend Density products. There seemed to be a good correlation with the TOE, as anticipated, but I'm still unsure about its utility as a stand-alone product. As for the Average Flash Area, I didn't even pull it up given the limited amount of screen space I had and what I saw yesterday, with the AFA in particular not giving me hope of being able to gather good info/lead time in comparison to the MFA.
~Gritty
Side note: Had some excellent conversation with the GLM expert in the room and as we were talking and analyzing some of these products, it was noticed that there was quite an extensive channel, lightning that shot out well to the north of this cluster of focus. These GLM products could provide beneficial information when providing DSS to partners, such as letting partners and the public know not to go back outside just because there's either light rain or the storm had already passed.
As the cluster of storms reached the eastern edge of a greater area of instability (below), the concern then turned to how much of the instability would be tapped into and how storms would react, with the thought that they'd likely become more robust. (continues below)
Attention was then turned to how the GLM was observing the evolution of the stronger cluster of storms within the northeastern portion of the CWA. I created a four-panel display, with MFA overlaid onto the mesosector visby imagery (upper left, below), clean IR with TOE overlaid (upper right; I had blinking enabled to capture the highest fJ, but is unseen in this GIF), Event Density with Group Centroid Density overlaid (bottom right, below), and FED with Flash Centroid Density overlaid (bottom right, below). It was fascinating to watch how the lightning unfolded with this particular cluster, and the MFA in particular immediately drew my eye to the storms moving toward the FWD CWA border. The smaller flashes began to blossom and expand out, which then had me look at the TOE and density products. The density products ramped up, but what I found the most interesting is that the MFA seemed to give me that initial clue that this storm was in fact tapping into some of the higher instability and allowing for the updraft(s) to intensify.
I then proceeded to take a look at the MRMS LL AzShear product (below), wistfully wishing I could look at the single radar version of this product. Sure enough, a clear signature developed, highlighting the amplifying wind within this cluster.
Last but not least, looking at ProbSevere, the ProbWind product picked up well on this signature, highlighted below.
Conclusion: I'm continuing to see some promise that there's something to look deeper into with respect to these additional lightning products, particularly the MFA when used in combination of something like the Event or Flash Extend Density products. There seemed to be a good correlation with the TOE, as anticipated, but I'm still unsure about its utility as a stand-alone product. As for the Average Flash Area, I didn't even pull it up given the limited amount of screen space I had and what I saw yesterday, with the AFA in particular not giving me hope of being able to gather good info/lead time in comparison to the MFA.
~Gritty
Side note: Had some excellent conversation with the GLM expert in the room and as we were talking and analyzing some of these products, it was noticed that there was quite an extensive channel, lightning that shot out well to the north of this cluster of focus. These GLM products could provide beneficial information when providing DSS to partners, such as letting partners and the public know not to go back outside just because there's either light rain or the storm had already passed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)